Just saw ??The Prestige?? as part of the ongoing birthday festivities. (We do birthdays a little bit at a time, not at all at once.) It was….a good movie, although not perfect, and difficult to relate to the book. In many respects, it was a loyal adaptation; it _felt_ right, mostly, in terms of the places and the times and the characters and their motivations. But the actual events differed considerably, and not just in the “Oh, yeah, we ran out of time, so we had to cut that,” sense, but in the, “No, we felt that that essential plot point wouldn’t make enough sense on film.”
What’s particularly interesting is that every horrible thing that happens in the movie — every death, every injury, almost every betrayal — does not occur in the book. Other horrible things certainly do occur (although on the whole no one’s crimes are as dire in the book as they are in the film), but it’s interesting to me that the substitutions should be *so* extensive, especially since so much effort was devoted to keeping the characters themselves so authentic.
Another strange thing, and this may be an error in my memory of the book, but I believe that many or most of the scenes in the film are viewed from the perspective of Angier in the book are viewed from the perspective of Borden in the film, and vice versa, to the point I had my sense of which was the villain change. And my sense of which was the villain was already divided — since they each play the role at different times in both stories. Swapping those around just leads to a total confusion on my part regarding how I ought to feel.
In other words, it was a lot like watching an alternate universe episode of ??Star Trek??….
The only two things that didn’t work for me were the critical changes made to the finales for the two characters — or, rather, the endpoints of the stories in the film, since the books doesn’t finish them off at the same time (in fact, they both have several different “ends” in the book). The basic function of Tesla’s machine is different in the film, in a way that necessitates actions which have drastically different moral implications for the Angier character, and Borden’s…identity problem is very different. There is an essential moment of confrontation in the book in which Borden admits that he no longer knows a certain thing; not only does this not occur in the film, but it is made absolutely clear that Borden knows exactly that thing.
This is a bit annoying.