It is a well-known fact that I am all about television. I love it, absolutely. Or, rather, I am passionate about it, which sometimes means love and sometimes means hate. And I definitely believe that, one way or another, “TV is the future.”:http://www.livejournal.com/users/kukkurovaca/108521.html
So, the beginning of a new fall season is always a time of high drama for me — hope, disappointment, anxiety, joy. And, of course, the stakes are raised by the ongoing problem of Nick’s Law. Nick’s Law stipulates that if (a) I like a show, and (b) I watch it from the beginning of its run, it will be cancelled and/or tragically retooled within two seasons.
If you’d like to review some of the evidence yourself, I have a “UGP Page”:http://kukkurovaca.textdriven.com:2521/ugp/show/Nick’s+Law on it. Victims include ??Clone High??, ??Sports Night??, ??Push, Nevada??, ??Miracles??, ??Karen Sisco,??, and even seemingly ready-made crowd-pleasers like ??FastLane?? and ??She Spies?? (if you haven’t watched the first season of this formerly hilarious show, you aren’t allowed to snicker). Shows whose survival is attributable entirely to my ignoring them until they were a good two or three seasons in include ??Alias?? and ??West Wing??.
Now, there have been some close calls for the Law. ??Everwood?? is a borderline case; it would be possible to argue that it did not undergo a retooling as such. However, the show changed radically in the quality and above all the weirdness of its writing after the first season was over. But we have yet to see a show that clearly and definitively disproved the rule.
The only serious candidate from last year is ??Lost??, which I watched with great determination, based on my loyalty to ??Alias??, and which, in addition to impressing me, seems to have actually caught public attention as well. The question is, can it hold that attention even as it proceeds to break down (presumably) some of the mysteries which hooked us in? And I believe it can, because with ??Alias?? Abrams continually demonstrated great skill in keeping audiences on board through just the sort of transitions that normally threaten a “What the hell is happening now?” show like ??Lost??. (??Push, Nevada??, for example, was not so skillfully managed.) So, my hope with regard to ??Lost?? is strong.
But even if tragedy strikes everyone’s favorite castaways, hope will still remain. ??Threshold?? and ??Invasion?? are bringing out two of my favorite underemployed actors, Carla Gugino and William Fichtner (amazingly, no one seems to think it’s funny when I explain him by saying he “Fichtns”), and, apparently, pitting them against creepy alien forces.
Another not-unfamiliar face is ??Prison Break??’s Dominic Purcell an alum of the horrible, horrible, but eerily fascinating ??John Doe?? (conspiracy of evil mutes versus time traveler? Not quite, but something like that); it also features a plot that remind me of a Delany short story, which has to be either a very, very good sign or a very, very bad one. I like the premise (architect with the blueprints breaks into prison to help his brother) and the storytelling potential of confined spaces.
I don’t know anything about ??Surface??, except that my kneejerk response to the premise is, “We’ve been needing something to take the place of ??Seaquest??; and while I’m similarly agnostic about the value of ??Commander in Chief??, there’s something to be said about the idea that we need to be able to envision, things before we can do them, so I’m all for more representation of female presidents in the media. And while I’m really not at all optimistic about ??Supernatural?? or ??The Night Stalker??, they’re bound to be good for a few laughs, if nothing else. Obviously not ??Veritas: The Quest??-style laughs, but still.
In short, even if the curse isn’t broken, there should still be some amusement to be had. One can hope.
“A rough chart of the fall lineup”:http://kukkurovaca.textdriven.com:2521/ugp/show/2005+Lineup